Nussle's argument about the "fiscal surplus" masking deficits in
our defense and homeland security capabilities points to another
missed opportunity for conservatives and Republicans: After 9/11,
we could have had a debate about returning government to its proper
role. While I'm not a fan of many of the things this administration
has done in foreign policy, national defense is a legitimate
function of the federal government. To the extent that our spending
in other areas was making it difficult to perform that legitimate
function, the other spending should have been cut. Even New Deal
liberals like FDR and Harry Truman cut non-war spending in wartime,
a fact Nussle's predecessor Mitch Daniels emphasized in a 2002
Washington Post op-ed. Yet armed with that knowledge, Bush
and the Republican Congress instead allowed spending increases
across the board. It's nice of them to object now that the
Democrats are doing the same, but it would have been better for
them to have done something to limit government while the allegedly
limited-government party had unified control of Washington.
topics:
Foreign Policy