The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Denver Post columnist David Harsanyi, whom I interviewed here last year, has (like Tabin and Antle) waded into the gay marriage debate with a succinct little piece that begins like so:

No one can blame gay Americans for celebrating the California Supreme Court's recent decision to overturn a voter-approved ban on gay marriage. At first glance, the case appears to be a key victory for same-sex marriage proponents. But, in truth, any judicial action that strikes down a democratically enacted law is a step in wrong direction - both tactically and ideologically.

There is no way around it. At some point, a majority of American voters, rather than a slight majority of judges, must be convinced that gay marriage deserves legal recognition. Don't get me wrong. I count myself among the convinced. Committed relationships - socially, emotionally, sexually - between two individuals, whatever the gender component, is favorable to a lack of such relationships.

If Ashton Kutcher can call it marriage, well . . . come on.

topics:
Law, Supreme Court

About the Author

Shawn Macomber is a contributing editor to The American Spectator.

http://spectator.org/blog/2008/05/20/for-gay-marriageagainst-judici

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT