Denver Post columnist David Harsanyi, whom I interviewed here last year, has (like Tabin and Antle) waded into the gay marriage debate with a succinct little piece that begins like so:
No one can blame gay Americans for celebrating
the California Supreme Court's recent decision to overturn a
voter-approved ban on gay marriage. At first glance, the case
appears to be a key victory for same-sex marriage proponents. But,
in truth, any judicial action that strikes down a democratically
enacted law is a step in wrong direction - both tactically and
ideologically.
There is no way around
it. At some point, a majority of American voters, rather than a
slight majority of judges, must be convinced that gay marriage
deserves legal recognition. Don't get me wrong. I count myself
among the convinced. Committed relationships - socially,
emotionally, sexually - between two individuals, whatever the
gender component, is favorable to a lack of such
relationships.
If Ashton Kutcher can call it marriage, well . . . come on.
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.