Thanks, James. Indeed,
Flynn's short article packs several good phrases:
There is no conservative movement. It is one of the
many casualties of the George W. Bush presidency. The arcane phrase
reflects a world of YAFers, "Don't Immanentize the Eschaton"
buttons, and debates over the Bricker Amendment. That does not
exist anymore. . . .
Conservatism the label became more popular than conservatism the
outlook. Thus, people who mistake Russell Kirk for the captain of
the Starship Enterprise jumped on the bandwagon, hijacked the
driver's seat, and sent it off course. The more that people called
themselves "conservative," the less "conservative" resembled
conservatism.
I think it's worth noting that "What's Wrong With The GOP?" has
long been a favorite parlor game for conservatives. Sputtering rage
breaks out on the Right whenever conservatives are especially
frustrated by Republican ineptitude, which is quite often. Yet that
kind of routine grumbling never gets written up by the New
Yorker.
However, when the GOP starts losing elections, the liberal media
never blames the Susan Collinses and Arlen Specters and George
Voinoviches. There's always a rush to blame conservatives or
conservatism. I remember this after Clinton was re-elected in 1996,
and it erupted again after the '98 Republican mid-term losses. Yet
after the 2002 and '04 GOP victories, we were told that
conservatism has triumphed. Now a few bad years later, conservatism
is being hurried to the graveyard. Let's keep our powder dry and
resist the urge to take advice from liberals.
topics:
Conservatism