Shortly before debating our publisher Al Regnery on Laura
Ingraham’s show yesterday, David Frum posted the following:
Here’s the problem: All the data I’ve seen suggests
that Republicans would be in even more trouble today if
they had followed a more principled line. That’s exactly why they
strayed from principle in the first place! The bloated prescription
drug benefit is popular! The expensive bits of No Child Left
Behind? Popular! School choice and social security reform?
Unpopular! Conservative social stances on Terri Schiavo, stem-cell
research, etc.? Way unpopular!
Let’s leave aside for a minute that he doesn’t mention Iraq,
which has done far more damage to Republicans than Social Security
reform or even Terri Schiavo. Sometimes conservatives can afford to
ignore the polls, I guess. Frum is right about what the polls show
on the issues he does mention and why the Republicans have so
frequently taken unprincipled positions, but I’m afraid that’s not
enough. What did the Medicare prescription drug benefit or No Child
Left Behind really buy us? At most, arguably, Bush’s second term.
But the Democrats have already regained their traditional
advantages on these issues. Republicans are already fumbling around
looking for new issues with which to win elections. And the damage,
both to the party and the country, of having enacted the
prescription drug benefit while failing to reform Social Security
has been done.
Big government conservatism has so far been like Rockefeller
Republicanism: Helpful to individual politicians who espouse it in
the right political conditions, unhelpful to the Republican Party
as a whole. Whatever gains Bush made among seniors and parents
worried about public schools in 2004, the GOP as a whole lost its
brand as a fiscally responsible party while entering a bidding war
with the Democrats that it cannot win. The Republicans end up
getting blamed for the red ink without getting any credit for the
programs they’ve built or expanded.
Frum is right about the need to identify conservative policies
that will deal with the things the voters actually care about, like
rising health care costs, middle-class income stagnation, and high
energy prices. Those are different problems than the ones Ronald
Reagan was elected to solve. But if conservatives do not find ways
to deal with these issues on conservative terms rather than liberal
terms, they will lose even if the occasional Bush or McCain
wins.