The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Jim, I'm going to seize the opportunity of your post, and the Politico article you link, to critique Newt's plea to Republicans that Human Events posted, which the Politico piece draws from heavily.

Newt's assessment of the malaise plaguing the GOP is indisputable, although I don't think it's news to anybody, and I do think the two House races featured extremely weak candidates. Clearly improved recruitment is needed, but I don't see anyone getting excited over his prescribed remedies. For example, his solutions to the energy problems are, much like the Clinton/McCain proposals to temporarily repeal the gas tax, are cosmetic and accomplish little. More boldly conservatives ought to be bashing biofuels and pursuing repeals of ethanol subsidies. But Newt has bought into the global warming alarmism and so his responses on the enviro/energy issues aren't likely to be strong.

And is anyone going to get their dander up over flaws with the census? A space-based air traffic control system? Union workers' rights to a secret ballot? Some or all of these may be great ideas, but I don't see them as issues in most peoples' top 50, much less the top 10.

Given his reputation, I expected more out of Newt.

topics:
Global Warming, Law, Energy

About the Author

Paul Chesser is executive director for the American Tradition Institute and a senior fellow for the Commonwealth Foundation for Public Policy Alternatives. The views he expresses do not necessarily reflect the views of these organizations.

http://spectator.org/blog/2008/05/07/re-house-republicans-ready--2

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT