This
report from the reliable David Freddoso is the second time I
have seen this same information (I take it more seriously now that
Freddoso is reporting it), and it chafes me no end. Basically, it
says that McCain won't consider Mark Sanford for Veep because of
hard feelings about Sanford not endorsing McCain in the primaries
this time after having done so in 2000. If this is true, it shows
incredibly pettiness, arrogance, and stupidity on the part of the
McCainiacs, very much in line with the overblown code of loyalty
that led both Bushes to value loyalty and even sycophancy above
merit.
Just because Sanford endorsed McCain in 2000, as a congressman,
doesn't mean he is obligated to do so again as a governor in 2008
-- at least not in any sane world. People don't OWE loyalty for so
long; if anything, McCain owes Sanford for going out on a limb for
him in 2000, rather than having a right to expect the same
limb-walking again eight years later.
Furthermore, it is not as if Sanford HARMED McCain: the governor
did not endorse anybody else this time around, either; and McCain
won the South Carolina primary, perhaps his most important and
nerve-wracking victory of the whole primary season, anyway.
Look: If Sanford would make a good vice president and a good
vice presidential candidate, it shouldn't matter one bleeping bit
who he endorsed. He could have endorsed Duncan Hunter and he still
should be strongly considered by McCain. On the other hand, if
Sanford would not make a good Veep and a good Veep candidate (two
separate questions, by the way), then McCain should not consider
him even if Sanford had literally carried McCain's bags on every
political trip McCain had taken in the past eight years.
Again, all of this is based on the assumption that Freddoso's
report is accurate. But if it is, it gives me yet another reason,
just as I am searching for reasons to support McCain, to think,
again, that he has some serious deficiencies of character and
judgment.