In a few places I've seen Obama's bitter-Pennsylvanians remark interpreted as the "Thomas Frankian idea that getting-by small town voters are being snookered into voting Republican over Gods, Guns and Gays." But Obama wasn't saying that cultural issues are a distraction from economic issues -- he was saying that downscale voters "cling to guns or religion" etc. because they're bitter about economic circumstances. Correct me if I'm wrong -- I haven't read What's the Matter With Kansas? -- but isn't that a little different from, and more radical than, Frank's thesis?
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.