Peter Suderman is calling
for better conservative journalism:
…too much of it has become devoted to little more than
ideological bullying. And while I don’t think that’s always
unreasonable (it is, after all, opinion journalism), I’d also love
to see, along with greater collegiality, more curiosity, more
creativity, more observation, and less fist-pounding. Writers of
the conservative persuasion, or anything somewhat resembling it,
ought to spend more time wondering about how the world is and less
demanding that it change to suit their whims.
So where should we direct these efforts?
National
Review,
The Weekly Standard,
The American Spectator,
City Journal and
Reason, among
others, are integral to the right’s intellectual health… but
our sharpness and ability to win converts also depends on engaging
centrist, liberal and apolitical Americans.
My fear is that the right puts too little emphasis on that task,
which is why I agree with
Ross that the younger generation of heterodox conservative
writers is cause for cautious optimism-but only if the work we do
writing for movement magazines is merely a part of our oeuvre.
An American reading unaffiliated newspapers or magazines is
likely to encounter talented liberal writers and thinkers, and
significantly less likely to encounter journalists from the
conservative or libertarian right. So far the right’s response to
this bias has understandably been to create our own outlets for
opinion and analysis, a project that has been quite successful.
But it isn’t fated that unaffiliated publications must be de
facto liberal, and the right ought to endeavor to prove it.