I agree with much of what Jim wrote below. I should emphasize that I don’t have problems with an open and honest debate about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. However, what makes me uneasy is that whatever their motivations, many of today’s critics of Israel invariably turn to arguments that are hauntingly similar to arguments made by yesterday’s anti-Semites against Jews in general.
A good example of old style anti-Semitism is Henry Ford’s The International Jew: The World’s Foremost Problem and other writings in his Dearborn Independent from the early 1920s.
Today, the argument is that wealthy Jewish donors from New York City influence politicians in both parties, and no politician is willing to challenge them on Israel. Back then it was, “the Jews have been strong in all parties, so that whichever way the election went, the Jews would win. In New York it is always the Jewish party that wins.”
Today, we have complaints about the “Israel Lobby,” but back then it was the “Jewish Lobby.”
Today, critics of Israel lament that honest debate is being stifled in the media, and people are afraid to speak up out of fear of being labeled anti-Semitic. Those who wanted to discuss the “Jewish Question” in Ford’s day had the same beef:
Of course, the only acceptable explanation of any public
discussion at present of the Jewish Question is that some
one-writer, or publisher, or a related interest-is a Jew-hater.
That idea seems to be fixed; it is fixed in the Jew by inheritance;
it is sought to be fixed in the Gentile by propaganda, that any
writing which does not simply cloy and drip in syrupy sweetness
toward things Jewish is born of prejudice and hatred. It is,
therefore, full of lies, insult, insinuation, and constitutes an
instigation to massacre.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?