On the question of whether government-recognized same-sex
marriage actually expands individual freedom, this post by Austin Bramwell strikes me as
about right. Aside from some incidents of marriage like hospital
visitation rights that might be extended more widely -- and
granting that some efforts to prevent same-sex marriage are overly
broad, potentially impacting legitimate freedoms of contract -- the
campaign for same-sex marriage is really more about recognition
than freedom. I don't want to make it illegal for people to live
together, share property, or even go to their local Unitarian
church and claim to be married. Proponents of same-sex marriage
want the government to make me pretend I agree with such claims.
And a definition of marriage that doesn't exclude some
relationships is totally meaningless.