The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Re: Populist Quin

Quin, now you are arguing with your own column. You write, "It really is a problem, both morally and politically, when corporate execs get $70 million parachutes when they flee failed companies." You aren't saying that is too much money? You further state, "the solution is to give companies an incentive not to lavish so much wealth on so few individuals." Excessive wealth, maybe? Now you are saying that you don't want to give companies an incentive to "keep executive compensation lower" and that you are only trying to provide "populist cover" for free-market Social Security reform. Aside from blowing your own cover, you have backed away from a key rationale for your own idea.

Anyway, since we're nowhere close to abolishing the corporate income tax, it's all a moot point. But do get back to me and let me know which Quin wins the argument.

topics:
Social Security

View all comments (1) | Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by W. James Antle, III

http://spectator.org/blog/2008/03/27/re-populist-quin
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

Coulter Care

Peter Ferrara | 2.8.12

Thank Him, Santorum!

Jay D. Homnick | 2.8.12

Bigoted Barack, Red in Tooth and Clause

George Neumayr | 2.10.12

ADVERTISEMENT