Well, not exactly. But Kevin Gutzman, author of The
Politically Incorrect Guide to the Constitution argues that gun control laws are
unwise, the Second Amendment does protect an individual right to
keep and bear arms -- and that the Supreme Court has no
constitutional authority to overturn the D.C. gun ban because the
Constitution is intended to limit federal power, not overturn state
(or pseudo-state) laws.
Gutzman's argument hinges on the rejection of incorporation as a
valid constitutional doctrine. I'm afraid that's a debate
conservatives lost a long time ago.
topics:
Constitution, Law, Supreme Court