The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Re: Obama and Reagan

If Obama's speech worked, it's because he was able to address matters head on. Was Obama dismissing American ethnics resentful of welfare and affirmative action as racists? Or did he suggest that their resentments were understandable, no less so than the "anger in the black community" he mentioned? Jim is so right in his assessment of Obama's genius, not to mention the blinders many of the right are wearing in reaction to the speech (as I've noticed both on Fox and in listening to Rush). Let's not forget that conservatives were the last people he was addressing in his pre-Pennsylvania primary remarks. In purely liberal terms, he was saying things no other Democratic candidate would dare utter, and assuming a more intelligent audience than a pol normally does. Best of all for him, given time and the right forum, he was able to return to his strengths. He was the center of huge attention. When's the last time Hillary enjoyed such an unchallenged moment?

About the Author

Wlady Pleszczynski is editorial director of The American Spectator and editor-at-large of AmSpec Online.

http://spectator.org/blog/2008/03/18/re-obama-and-reagan

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT