I have lots and lots of thoughts on Obama's speech, some
positive, some negative -- and may not have time to publish them or
to give the speech justice. So do NOT take this as my only reaction
to the speech, which really was an admirably thoughtful (if at
times very wrongheaded) address.
Okay, enough with the disclaimer. Here's what really bothered me,
right at the start, enough (if I hadn't already read Ed Whelan, who
handled the issue quite well on a more substantive level) to make
it hard to take seriously Obama's claims to really care about the
Constitution or to be an expert about it. To me, it showed profound
ignorance for him to talk about the Constitutional Convention in
1787 meeting "throughout the Spring." Well, no, it was not
throughout the spring. The convention didn't even get started until
well into May, and it met throughout a long, stifling summer. The
delegates literally suffered physically from the heat and the bugs,
and from various ailments, in order to create this wonderful
Constitution which created a country Obama is convinced still, even
today, needs more effort to "perfect." ("Perfect" used as a
verb.)
The summer and the uncomfortableness of the whole enterprise are
important parts of the story -- a story that I still doubt Obama
appreciates, much as I still doubt that he really appreciates the
accomplishment that came from it.