The loss of Dennis Hastert's seat is a fitting testament to the
devastation the former speaker wrought on the Republican Party. He
was a terrible speaker (if somebody wants to add the link to my
column called Hastert La Vista from a couple of years ago, feel
free), taking up the cause of big spending with a passion, begging
Bush not to veto any spending bills, and putting up with all sorts
of unethical behavior. Now, to top it all off, his retirement
(better name for it: QUITTING mid-term) gives up a seat to the
Dems. This reflects badly on Hastert on two levels. First, it shows
how badly he seeded his own district, where he obviously left a bad
taste in voters' mouths if not even this GOP-leaning district would
go for a Republican to replace him. Second, it makes it even worse
that he quite mid-term. I have serious philosophical problems with
people like Hastert and Lott and Louisiana's Richard Baker who quit
mid-term (UNLESS they are enmeshed in a scandal or unless they have
serious family needs that come up, or unless they get a promotion
such as a Cabinet appointment). By running for a seat, they
effectively promise their constituents that they will serve out
their terms. By not living up to that commitment, they force their
constituents to pay for another election, and force them to lose
valuable seniority mid-term. It is a quitter's way, a greedy way
(if they quit in order to grab a lobbying job), a self-centered way
(Hastert couldn't be speaker so he took his ball and went home), or
possibly a coward's way. It stinks. And Hastert, for whom I
originally had high hopes and high respect, will not be remembered
kindly as he slinks away.