The Air Force made
the right decision today in awarding a huge new air tanker
contract to Northrop Grumman and EADS over Boeing. As I wrote in
this
column last year, the Northrop plane is by far the better
option. Key section of that column:
Its capabilities exceed that of the Boeing KC-767
in a veritable host of measurements. Those indices range from
maximum fuel load to maximum number of passengers (making it a
dual-use plane) to payload tonnage to fuel efficiency and "mission
effectiveness."
The last four times the two planes have been in
competition, including for tankers for Great Britain and for the
West-friendly United Arab Emirates, the KC-30 (NGE's) has
won.
Not only that, but Boeing's actual performance
(on-time delivery, etc.) in recent years has been anything but
stellar. And the whole reason the tanker is out to bid right now at
all is that the Air Force's earlier award to Boeing of the first
$20 billion contract for the planes was so rife with corruption
that a Boeing official and an Air Force officer went to jail and
Air Force Secretary James Roche and Boeing CEO Phil Condit both
resigned. Because of those shenanigans, U.S. Sen. John McCain was
able to force cancellation of that deal and force it to be
re-bid.
But there is another good reason for conservatives to be happy that
Boeing lost out. Just yesterday, the Bush administration reported
that it will take three extra years to build a key section of the
border fence (or virtual border fence) -- a development over which
many conservatives are justly FURIOUS -- because Boeing screwed up
the technology. It would really be a finger in the eye of
strong-border-protection advocates to award such a huge contract to
Boeing in the same week the story came out about the horrible delay
(and expensive delay) caused by Boeing's failures.
Of course, I still think the Air Force ought to have considered splitting the contract award, for all the reasons I listed in my original column -- but if it did not split it, it made much more sense to go with Northrop's bigger plane than with Boeing.
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.