Using Hillary Clinton's Shame speech as a jumping off point, Julian Sanchez looks at the offending Obama literature and comes away unimpressed, despite the supposed implicit Harry and Louise reference:
If anything's really noxious here it's that
Obama is, by most accounts I've seen, the more sincere free-trader
at heart, and that both candidates feel obligated to go through
this ridiculous more-protectionist-than-thou pantomime when both
candidates clearly know better.
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.