I'm no fan of public financing of elections, but it strikes me that politically speaking, John McCain's insistence that Barack Obama stay true to his pledge to use public financing in the general election if the Republican candidate agreed to it, is a master stroke. If McCain locks Obama into the public financing system in a general election, Obama would be giving up a massive fundraising edge over McCain. More likely, Obama will break his pledge, because he'd be crazy to forgo the windfall of donations he'd receive as the Democratic nominee. That will allow McCain to expose Obama--for all his talk about ushering in a "new kind of politics," at the end of the day, he's just like any other politician who will abandon his principles for cash. Already, this has led the Washington Post editorial board to hit Obama for waffling and campaign finance reform groups to pressure Obama into honoring his commitment. Liberal bloggers have contended that Obama never actually made a pledge, but I think this, as noted in the Post editorial, is pretty clear:
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.