When I was walking out of the Obama speech this afternoon, I began to wonder whether there was a danger that McCain's comments in New Hampshire about being fine with a 100-year U.S. presence in Iraq would come back to haunt him in the general election like John Kerry's infamous, "I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it."
In 2004, Kerry's complicated legislative explanation for his statement didn't matter, because the remark fit in perfectly with the narrative that he was a flip-flopper at a time when a nation at war needed a strong commander in chief who would stick to his convictions. Even though McCain's reasoning makes sense--that we still have troops in Japan and South Korea, but few people make a fuss, because there aren't large casualties--the details will get lost in all the noise, because the statement reinforces the sense that McCain wants to keep troops in Iraq forever at a time when a majority of Americans want out. Of course, I hope I'm wrong, but Obama has clearly been hitting this 100 year war thing hard.
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.
biniki| 9.2.09 @ 9:41PM
bikini
bikini swimwear