The feeling of dejection Jim Antle noted earlier is no longer
necessary. His speech was phenomenal. Not because I like McCain,
but because the majority of people with whom I spoke following the
speech, who had initial concerns about McCain, were convinced to
support him.
"If he keeps his word, then I would definitely support him. But
regardless, he would definitely be better than Obama or Clinton,"
said one conference attendee.
The room was stuffed full of McCain campaign supporters armed
with signs and healthy vocal cords. Any boos (and there were a few)
were crowded out by their cheering. It was difficult to gauge the
ardent supporters vs. the newly converted, but the booing did seem
to die down as the speech went on.
Most surprising were the introductions: George Allen, followed
by Tom Coburn. Allen, whose chances at a vice presidential bid are
mired in concern for more accusations of racism, was a charismatic
beginner, and most of the conservatives in the room recognized him
as one of their own (rather than the has-been he seems to be in the
mainstream).
Coburn, on the other hand, offered the most compelling
arguments: Conservatives must look at the larger picture and see
what would happen should a Democrat come into office. The
Republican Party hasn't had a consistent conservative political
agenda since 1995. And that Coburn wouldn't support McCain if he
weren't an advocate of conservative, pro-life justices (in a sly
answer to the Novak/Fund stories about McCain's alleged hesitation
on Alito).
McCain's speech was self-effacing, too. He didn't attempt to
play down differences. He spoke with refreshing candor.
The question is whether McCain's nuance of having a conservative
record but having differences with the party will result in greater
support. Will red meat Republicans buy it for fear of a Clinton
presidency? Will he be supported on his own merits, and overcome
the resistant attitude of many still floating in the
conference?