I'm actually closer to Quin than to Phil on the subject of John
McCain. But I'll play devil's advocate a little bit here. Quin says
it is inconsistent for McCain to tout an endorsement by Sam
Brownback, who opposed the surge, while criticizing Mitt Romney's
tepid support for the surge. But when a candidate accepts an
endorsement, they are not accepting all of the views of the person
doing the endorsing. McCain is touting the Brownback endorsement as
evidence of his pro-life position and acceptability to social
conservatives, not his national-security credentials.
And while it's true that Huckabee is still in the race, I'm not
sure it is inconsistent for McCain to focus his attacks on the
candidate who is actually directly competing with him in the most
states. By that logic, it is inconsistent for McCain not to also be
attacking Ron Paul. McCain is attacking the candidate he sees as
the biggest threat to his nomination, for the same reason Romney
spent time on today's blogger conference call criticizing McCain
but not the other candidates.