The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Wrong From the Middle

I know Mr. Antle just promised a let-up in the Right From the Beginning references on this blog, but events beyond our control intervened over the weekend with Chris Suellentrop's panning of Pat Buchanan's new book, Day of Reckoning, in the New York Times. Here's the relevant slice from the review midsection:

The self-serving nature of the book begins with its epigraph, a quotation from one of Buchanan's previous books, to which the title "Day of Reckoning" alludes. (Yeats gets second billing, atop the introduction.) Buchanan titled one of his earlier books "Right From the Beginning," and he's eager to prove his prescience once more throughout this new book.

The first issue I have with this is, as anyone who read Buchanan's books from the mid- to late nineties knows, the man can claim some bragging rights for having anticipated early millenial trends with some prescience. While I may seldom agree with Buchanan's political prescriptions for those problems these days, I can say it's more than a little disingenuous to shellac him as a self-obsessed man who doesn't take stock of the world with some intellectual heft. (The 2000 presidential race notwithstanding.)

The bigger problem, though, is with Suellentrop's interpretation of the title of Right From the Beginning, which is a great autobiography that begins...right at the beginning of Buchanan's life. It's probably also a play on the origins of his conservativism. What the book title is not, however, is simply another way of saying Correct From the Beginning or Right About Everything From the Beginning. And, actually, since Suellentrop clearly didn't feel the need to dive into Buchanan's canon for his review, it should also be noted that when he changes his mind on something--say free trade--Buchanan fesses up to it, acknowledges his past views and walks readers through the paces he walked to get to his new position. Clearly, that's not the best way to make friends, left or right, but there is a difference between someone who is ruled by ideology and someone who challenges orthodoxy.

topics:
Trade, Books

Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by Shawn Macomber

http://spectator.org/blog/2008/01/28/wrong-from-the-middle

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Gallup: Veterans Prefer Romney

W. James Antle, III | 5.28.12

Markos Moulitsas is Scum

Quin Hillyer | 5.28.12

Weekend Political Wrap-Up, Memorial Day Edition

W. James Antle, III | 5.27.12

An Honor Flight Story

TAS Staff | 5.26.12

WaPost Criticizes Romney's Lack of Rhythm

Aaron Goldstein | 5.25.12

Tom Coburn on the Debt 'Disease'

Vivien Chang | 5.25.12

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

Markos Moulitsas is Scum

Quin Hillyer | 5.28.12

ADVERTISEMENT