Philip,
1) I don't want Republicans to use the filibuster, because I
believe it is unconstitutional to filibuster judges -- and even if
it is constitutional, it so violates the spirit of the document and
214 years of tradition that I believe it is illegitimate.
2) The GOP will NEVER use the filibuster in such a way on judges.
They never have done so before, so why would they start now?
3) McCain himself, bipartisan Hillary pal that he is, would NEVER
support such a filibuster.
4) If the GOP had shown enough backbone to kill this misuse of the
filibuster, they may have kept the Senate, and would not be in
position in the first place to even consider misusing the
filibuster.
5) The deal did NOT help other judges get confirmed. The pace of
confirmations SLOWED considerably after the Gang of 14 deal.
Indeed, more nominees got blocked after the deal, even with 55 GOP
senators, than had been blocked before the deal, with only 51 GOP
senators. Meanwhile, I flat-out don't believe that Roberts or Alito
would have been blocked absent the Gang deal. Moreover, remember
that the two main choices were: Constitutional Option, or Gang. If
people with the clout of McCain had openly and fully supported the
constitutional option, the other wavering senators (or at least
enough of them) would likely have fallen in line. And then the
floodgates would have been opened for all reasonable nominees.
6) This is the area I have covered more closely than any other area
in the federal government. I was apprised of all the ins and outs
of what was going on. I knew about the constitutional option
literally months before it was made public. What McCain etc did was
such a knife in the back of judicial conservative activists that it
basically killed the movement at the appellate level. There has
only been one single worthwhile fight over appellate judges since
the deal -- that of Brett Kavanaugh, who was so close to Bush that
the GOP Senate got the message he HAD to go through. Basically,
ever since the Gang deal (the Gang bang, it should be called), the
issue over judges that had been such a rallying point against the
Left just faded away.
And McCain is personally more at fault for all of this than any
other senator.
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.