Three quick points. First, some high-profile conservative
Republicans have encouraged evangelical identity
politics and victimology (e.g., the War on Christians) when it has
been politically beneficial. As Dougherty put it in his piece,
"Ironically, the anti-elite posture that Beltway conservatives
taught heartlanders to assume when confronting the media or
academia has been turned against establishment conservatives
themselves."
Second, I think you are misreading Neumayr, who I believe has
specific (if unnamed) Huckabee critics in mind. Some of those who
attacked Huckabee have been especially eager to excuse the
heterodoxies of other Republican politicians. And in a heterodox
Republican presidential field, there was always going to be a
competition among conservative factions to see which heterodoxies
should be disqualifying. Neumayr is defending social conservatism
as a requirement for a GOP nominee, not playing the
evangelical-as-victim card (he is editor of a publication that isn't
evangelical).
Third, I'm not sure all McCain critics will find him as easy to
live with as Quin. Nevertheless, I'll repeat once again that I
agree that many of the criticisms of Huckabee were legitimate.
topics:
Conservatism