I have been mulling over
Bret Stephens' column on McCain and his discussion of "honor"
as the central premise of McCain's campaign. This sort of stuff
drives the McCain haters crazy, evoking howls that he is using his
war record in some inappropriate manner to evoke sympathy for him.
Perhaps it infuriates his foes (specifically his conservative ones)
because it suggests some higher purpose than politics. Or perhaps
they just dislike him for valid policy differences and it irks them
to be reminded that their hated opponent has a record of personal
courage that no other candidate (on either side) possesses. I
suspect that this thematic message does not trump policy issues for
many voters but it may be that we underestimate Americans' desire
for a hero figure. (Bill
Kristol wrote McCain is a neo-Victorian figure battling against
very modern opponents.) To some degree McCain's "honor" message is
akin to the Obama "hope" theme -- a rallying cry for supporters and
a bipartisan basis for attracting a-political voters in a general
election. (Both also evoke eyerolling from skeptics.) Can it be
overplayed? Of course. Is its potential impact under-appreciated?
I'm beginning to think so.