The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

RE: Gang of 14

I agree with the idea that the Gang of 14's MOU did result in getting some great judges seated. However, I believe that judicial filibusters are unconstitutional and would have loved to have seen the issue before the SCOTUS or the Nuclear Option detonated.

Has the Thompson campaign confirmed that he will not participate in this week's debate? On that subject, anyone notice this snide jab from Michael Medved?

"Fred Thompson's departure from the race is reportedly imminent, after he 'consults' with his hospital bound mother."

topics:
Constitution

View all comments (1) | Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by Lisa Fabrizio

http://spectator.org/blog/2008/01/21/re-gang-of-14-2
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

Coulter Care

Peter Ferrara | 2.8.12

Thank Him, Santorum!

Jay D. Homnick | 2.8.12

Bigoted Barack, Red in Tooth and Clause

George Neumayr | 2.10.12

ADVERTISEMENT