I have been meaning to write a much longer post on this subject,
and just never found the time, but.... the short version is this:
John McCain's behavior re judges has been not merely a bad judgment
call (i.e., that the Gang of 14 was a well-meaning but flawed
effort by McCain and others to ensure passage of some conservative
judges -- which I do NOT believe, by the way, because I believe the
real motivation was just to get the issue off the table as
painlessly as possible), but has actually been reprehensible.
Mark Levin and Andrew McCarthy do a
pretty solid job explaining why the Gang was a huge betrayal of
conservatives, ESPECIALLY by McCain. But they make one mistake: Jim
Haynes, the superbly qualified chief counsel at the Pentagon, was
NOT mentioned in the Gang deal. He was killed (as Levin and
McCarthy later note) not by Dems, but by the horrible Lindsey
Graham and McCain
acting in concert. There is much more to be said on this, and I
have written
about it twice.
Again, I will blog more about this later, but for now, please read
these linked stories and then try telling yourself that John McCain
cares about treating judicial nominees fairly and that he cares at
all about the whole issue of judges. He does not. And his nominees
would be just as likely to pass muster with Joe Lieberman than with
John Aschcroft.
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.