The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Gang of 14

I'm no fan of the Gang of 14 pact. But if the next president is a Democrat -- or even a not terribly conservative Republican -- conservatives may be grateful to still have judicial filibusters. Ideally, qualified judicial nominees put forward by presidents of both parties should be confirmed without regard to exacting philosophical litmus tests. They should at least get an up-or-down vote. But that arrangement can't work if it is only followed by one side, for the same reasons that unilateral disarmament isn't the soundest basis for national defense.

Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by W. James Antle, III

http://spectator.org/blog/2008/01/21/gang-of-14

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

A Test of National Honor

Hal G.P. Colebatch | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT