The two cents I always toss in at a time like this is this:
'The South' didn't secede. Two waves of southern states did. The
first wave left quite precipitously. The second wave -- composed
mostly of states that voted for the Constitutional Union ticket, a
party established for no other reason than to save the union --
departed only after it had become clear that Lincoln intended to
overturn secession in the Deep South by force.
States like Virginia and North Carolina had a practical interest
in at least taking their chances if they were destined to host the
battlefields on which Union and Sesesh troops clashed. But beyond
that, one must not pretend that the exit of the Upper South
transpired for anything like the 'reasons' that provoked the Cotton
States. Yes, there were slaves in all the slave states. But the
whole storyline was different...radically different.
It's quite simple, from where I'm pondering, to agree that the
Deep South was rather reckless and quite racist, whereas the Upper
South was significantly less so, and significantly better off in
the sympathy department. In fact, I think the distinction -- which
usually goes completely ignored -- is a vital one to a sound
understanding of American history.
Down from the soapbox I go.
topics:
Constitution
About the Author
James Poulos is a doctoral student at Georgetown and the former Political Editor of Culture11. His writing has been published by The American Conservative, The National Interest, The New Atlantis, Partnership for a Secure America, and The Weekly Standard. In addition to AmSpecBlog, he has blogged at The American Scene, Doublethink, and Postmodern Conservative, which he founded. With degrees in political science and law from Duke and USC, he is currently at work on a dissertation about life after Napoleon. In his spare time he anti-blogs at Pish Tosh.