The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Re: McCain

I would add one more point to what Phil said about the calls. McCain actually answers the questions, or what he thinks the question is, and if not (or if the questioner wants to follow up and press for further information) there is never a ” we need to move on.” Sometimes the back and forth can go on for awhile. Why is this important? When you get more material you actually do learn more about a candidate’s position and if he is good, he gets the chance to persuade. His opponents complain he gets kinder treatment and perhaps the MSM “likes” him better but it may be just a function of the amount of material he provides. Second, I find it reassuring that a potential president does not look at new media like a deer staring into oncoming trafffic —as a potential danger or annoyance to be avoided. Ultimately the President will have to communicate with the country and using new media to do it is smart and will in the long run provide conservatives with more comprehensive, unfiltered news.

View all comments (3) |

candyxiaoxiao| 8.28.09 @ 2:12AM

Cheap Ugg Boots
Ugg Boots UK

More Blog Posts by Jennifer Rubin

http://spectator.org/blog/2008/01/16/re-mccain

ADVERTISEMENT

Most Popular Articles

Obama and the IRS: The Smoking Gun?

Jeffrey Lord | 5.20.13

My Generation’s Disease

Benjamin Brophy | 5.17.13

The Liberal Union Behind the IRS

Jeffrey Lord | 5.16.13

Not Ready for Primetime Players

Daniel J. Flynn | 5.17.13

It's.The.Law

Ross Kaminsky | 5.20.13

Oops, Maybe Government is Tyrannical

Marta H. Mossburg | 5.17.13

Assessing a Week of Scandal

Matt Purple | 5.17.13

ADVERTISEMENT