The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Re: Here’s Why

Quin, you can make a creative argument for a lot of different scenarios, but I just don’t think this one is very realistic. It reminds me of when I used to listen to sports radio in New York in the 1990s, and you’d always get these callers that would concoct the most wild trade scenarios, that somehow always involved the Knicks giving up Greg Anthony and Anthony Mason and getting Michael Jordan and/or Karl Malone in return.

Of course, anything is theoretically possible in politics, and I give you tremendous credit for anticipating Huckabee’s rise, but some scenarios are more plausible than others, and I just don’t see Thompson-Romney happening within the next few days.

topics:
Trade, Sports

View all comments (1) |

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by Philip Klein

http://spectator.org/blog/2008/01/14/re-heres-why-2

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

My Generation’s Disease

Benjamin Brophy | 5.17.13

The Liberal Union Behind the IRS

Jeffrey Lord | 5.16.13

Not Ready for Primetime Players

Daniel J. Flynn | 5.17.13

Assessing a Week of Scandal

Matt Purple | 5.17.13

Oops, Maybe Government is Tyrannical

Marta H. Mossburg | 5.17.13

The View From the Other Side

George H. Wittman | 5.17.13

From Bimbos to Benghazi

Jeffrey Lord | 5.9.13

USPS: Radical Surgery Needed

Peter Hannaford | 5.17.13

ADVERTISEMENT