Re: Thompson-Romney. If Romney loses Michigan (which is the
predicate for the whole scenario), his goose is cooked. Totally.
And because the other candidates clearly dislike him, and because
he clearly adds NOTHING to any of the other candidates as part of a
ticket, he will have spent something like $15-$20 million of his
own money only to be relegated to oblivion. But he is young enough
to be Veep for four or eight years and still to serve as president.
being Veep, or the Veep nominee, is still the best ticket to a
presidential nomination. His one last chance could be to be THE GUY
who brought Thompson back from the dead. Romney is a practical man.
If it doesn't work, well, Romney would have wasted three days of an
endorsement, with the rest of his life to recover. But if it
somehow does work, it is his ticket to continuing political
relevancy.
As for Thompson, again, we are talking practical politics here. If
he wants to be president, he needs to move quickly. And his animus
against Romney doesn't seem anywhere near as strong as Giuliani's,
McCain's, or Huck's (Huck's being a combination of personal animus
and anti-Mormon bigotry, as evidenced by his NY Times comments).
For that matter, Thompson's animus against Romney isn't anywhere
near as strong as was Reagan's against Bush in 1980, or as was the
Kennedy-Johnson animus in 1960.
(I swear, the problem with people trained mostly as journalists is
that they don't think enough like creative politicians. Politics
isn't all about money and polls. It's not all science. It's art
combined with logic, instinct, and skillful gamesmanship. That's
why the Huckster is doing so well. That's why Obama is doing so
well. That's especialy why Bill Clinton did so well: He knows how
to CHANGE THE NARRATIVE if the narrative is not going his way. If
Romney loses Michigan, and if he and Thompson are creative enough
to want to change the narrative, this is one big way to do it. Not
the only way, but one way.... with literally nothing to lose.)