John, you are correct. What I should have said is the polls are
of little use in predicting the winner. Given that, you can sift through the news of the days looking for hints as
to who is up and down. McCain’s
crowds are large and enthusiastic. McCain gets in his
licks on the economy and commander in chief qualifications and
of course there is always a YouTube
to show Romney said something different a few years ago. However
Romney is getting
kudos for staying on message and upbeat.
If McCain wins, Romney will be “down for the
count” — except he has the money and desire to stay in the race
through February 5. If McCain loses he’ll “suffer a setback” —
except he’ll contend it was Romney’s home state and look for a
quick victory in SC. Would it be worse for Romney if he lost? Yes
but in this race apparently nothing is decisive.
Meanwhile, McCain’s win in NH did what Romney had
hoped it would have done for him: vault him to a commanding lead in
national polls.
NY/CBS has him with 33%, Huckabee at 18%, Rudy at 10% and
Romney and Thompson at 8%. (McCain holds a commanding advantage in
favorable/unfavorable ratings; Romney’s is the only one in negative
territory). According to the same poll, 62% think he shares GOP
vales while 63% think Huckabee does and 48% say the same for
Romney. McCain also laps the field on the electability argument.
Does THIS (and other
national polls showing a less dramatic bump) mean anything ?
Perhaps for three reasons: 1) February 5 big states may follow
similar patterns; 2) It may help McCain convince donors to put
their money down on the “leader” and 3) There is a reservoir of
support for McCain that may cushion the blow if he loses in
Michigan and sustain him through SC, Florida and February 5. Or it
could all be meaningless and change in the blink of an eye if
others win the next few primaries. UPDATE:
Wash Post/ABC also has McCain in
the lead (28%), with Huckabee next(20%) but Romney and Rudy not
that far behind.