Both the
Washington Post and the
Wall Street Journal have excellent op-eds making the same
point: the Democrats are in denial, verging on delusional, about
the success of the Surge. Yesterday, Brookings' Michael O'Hanlon
had
sharp words in the WSJ for Obama for vilifying Iraq war
supporters and, again, generally being clueless on the extent and
reasons for the progress there. Right now the focus is on
Obama-mania and the primary races, but when a Democratic nominee is
chosen he or she will find it increasingly hard to pretend nothing
has been accomplished and the immediate withdrawal notion is a good
one. That is not to say there isn't a legitimate issue to be had as
to how we promote a competent political regime that will allow us
to depart. While refreshingly candid, McCain's remarks that we may
be there for a hundred years may not be a politically sustainable
or winning position. So with Joe Biden gone from the presidential
race who will play the role of grown up and endure the boos of the
netroot crowd by reminding them that facts are stubborn
things?