First, as aside: There are LOTS of brilliant pieces on today's page. Phil, Jim, Shawn, Prowler, Jim B.... congratulations. Now, as for Jennifer's astute and absolutely on-target blog just below here about McEconomics, there IS one area of economics where McCain -- whose domestic policies on the whole are all almost entirely emoted rather than thought out, because logically, there is almost no coherence to them whatsoever -- just flat-out flunks every conservative test. That area is regulation. As I put it in my column last week, if it moves, McMean wants to regulate it. It is a terrible, terrible weakness. Frankly, I was surprised that Jack Kemp endorsed him -- a significant endorsement, to be sure -- both because of McAmnesty's opposition to the Bush tax cuts and especially because of McNasty's fondness for a regulatory state that Kemp, to his credit, always opposed. For that matter, where does McAngry stand on monetary policy? Kemp is well known as a gold bug. Is McCain? If he's not, then that is another reason why Kemp's endorsement would seem McInane....
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.
candyxiaoxiao| 8.28.09 @ 2:03AM
Ugg Boots UK
Buy Ugg Boots