Why would anyone want to keep Paul out of the debates? Without him, Republicans would be reduced to agreeing with each other.
I thought Giuliani did a great jub expressing the reality of the enemy we were facing, and rejecting Paul's absurd suggesting that criticizing Islamic terrorism was somehow anti-Muslim.
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.