Over at NRO, Jim Geraghty has a
smart piece on the differences between the heavily evangelical
states of Iowa and South Carolina. Iowa is more populist, less
hawkish, and and more receptive to candidates who emphasize social
issues while South Carolina has a religious right that is more
divided, more integrated into the party establishment, and more
hawkish on issues of national defense.
Some of this is slightly oversimplified, but it is definitely
true that Iowa has tended to be where socially conservative
candidates have peaked while South Carolina is where the party
establishment has circled the wagons against insurgent candidates.
Since 1988, S.C. is essentially where George H.W. Bush, Bob Dole,
and George W. Bush won the GOP nomination, while Iowa has been the
best state for Pat Robertson, Alan Keyes (and Steve Forbes), and,
if present trends continue, possibly Mike Huckabee.
There is a socially conservative majority to be had in South
Carolina. It will be interesting to see if Huckabee succeeds where
Pats Robertson and Buchanan failed.