The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Re; Luntz Panel

I was not clear. I did not mean already leaning, or politically favoring Romney but rather the sort of person who Romney would resonate with more than others. I can imagine that someone who loves Thompson's temperament and views when asked to participate would say: "You want me to waste 2 hours doing what?" When the eager staffer chirped up and said "But it's Frank Luntz", my mythical voter would grumble, "Never heard of him, but have a nice day." Bottom line: I think these panels are highly self-selecting and of virtually no use. I am more interested in Shawn's observation of crowd size and enthusiasm, however.

Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Jennifer Rubin

http://spectator.org/blog/2007/12/13/re-luntz-panel

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

A Test of National Honor

Hal G.P. Colebatch | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT