Bob Novak today: "All that is left for Romney to write is a
speech that asserts the Constitution imposes no religious test for
the presidency. However, that runs the risk of implicitly indicting
anyone who votes against Mitt Romney as a bigot. As he awaited the
Texas speech this week without knowing what Romney will say, one
adviser hoped that the candidate would come across as a man of
faith and integrity.That adviser is hoping to reverse Romney's
performance in last week's dismal Republican presidential debate at
St. Petersburg, Fla. Romney no longer is called the perfect
candidate hampered solely by religious prejudice. After a half-hour
immigrant-bashing duel with Rudy Giuliani, he looked like somebody
who would say anything to be nominated. At College Station today,
Romney will try to correct that impression, even if he does not win
over bigots."
That may be the real test for Romney: whether he projects a core of
personal faith, rather than someone marketing himself to religious
conservatives. And while all this is going on those libertarian
streaked New Hampshire voters are looking on -- and listening to
McCain talk about frugality and success in Iraq with Curt Schilling. Hard to be
everywhere and message separately to everyone. UPDATE: And some of
those NH voters in the Boston media market will be reading this which a bit over the top but
nevertheless I think correctly identifies Romney's problem as not a
Mormon one but a conviction one.
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.