The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Re: Specifically

Shawn I find your post entirely compelling (and of course my query about Lieberman was rhetorical and sarcastic). The mystery remains why such a fact driven, logical business type like Romney would do this. Was this a rare emotional outburst from a candidate who wanted to quiet the "give them The Speech" crowd? Did some polling convince him that if he talked in bland terms about faith, gave a long build up to The Speech and unleashed a torrent of press like we have been discussing that things would improve? If so, I'd love to see that polling. It may be naive to say he should be methodically pounding on issues like fiscal discipline, terrorism (I think Romney knew about the NIE) and immigration (ok maybe the last is a little dicier after last night) and touting his business background rather than going down this road, but that'd be my free advice.

topics:
Business, Immigration

Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by Jennifer Rubin

http://spectator.org/blog/2007/12/05/re-specifically
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

Bigoted Barack, Red in Tooth and Clause

George Neumayr | 2.10.12

Unsafe at Any Smoke

Eric Peters | 2.10.12

Access This

Ross Kaminsky | 2.10.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

The Show Me State's No Show Primary

Andrew B. Wilson | 2.10.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

No Double Play

Peter Hannaford | 2.10.12

ADVERTISEMENT