Yesterday we had this ad from a pro-choice
group and today we had this one from the Log Cabin
Republicans on taxes both raising the flip flop theme. Both have
some factual merit and are amusing but will they work? The Romney
folks
say in essence -- " Hey, look who's attacking us" -- and seem
confident they will have zero impact.(They also dispute the
substance of the tax allegations, presumably on the basis that they
do not consider fee increases and loophole closings to be tax
increases.) They may be right on the flawed messenger point. Until,
for example, Thompson converts his YouTube video into a more
effective ad, Romney can simply attack the messengers as Left
leaning liberal groups out to get him. There is one more debate in
Iowa before caucus time so we'll see if any of his opponents offer
similar critiques. But will they? Thompson himself seems entirely
reluctant to do the heavy lifting of pointing out his rival's flaws
so absent a YouTube video it is unclear whether he will go that
route. McCain? He drips contempt for Romney on foreign policy but
hasn't given him a going over on domestic matters. Huckabee likely
wants Romney to come after HIM so he can wink at the crowd and say
"See how scared the big dog gets when a new pup comes along?" (OK,
he'll say it better.) That leaves the head banging to Rudy. Judging
from the last debate and the campaign over the last week there will
be plenty of that. UPDATE: When
US News and others do another round of flip
flop stories it becomes more problematic as the flip flop tag
becomes part of the conventional wisdom and the shorthand by which
voters come to describe him.