Does Romney really think divorced people
shouldn't be president and Muslims don't get a cabinet seat until
their percentage of the population increases? Some people
areinsultedoramazedby the former.
As to the latter issue, Romney appeared to say thatMuslimsshould only be
in lower level positions, not the cabinet given their percentage of
the population. In light of the recent tussle over whether Judge
Tuttman was really an affirmative action hire I found this hard to
believe( even more so since Romney of all people should immediately
rule out religion as an disqualifier for public office) so I asked
spokesman Kevin Madden about it. He directed me to this from
Romney's CNN appearance: "... But I also think that suggesting that
we have to fill spots based on checking off boxes of various ethnic
groups is really a very inappropriate way to think about how we
staff positions. I'm very pleased that, among my Cabinet members,
for instance, I had several African-American individuals. I had
people of different backgrounds. But I don't go in every
circumstance I'm in and say, OK, how many African-Americans, how
many Hispanic-Americans, how many Asian-Americans, and fill boxes
that way. I fill responsibilities based upon people's merit and
their skill. And, sometimes, it includes many ethnic minorities.
And, other times, it includes different minorities. But I'm very
pleased with my record." Madden also added: "At this point, we're
not focused on what Governor Romney's cabinet might look like. But
the Governor does not believe that in order to effectively fight
radical jihad you need to have Muslims serving in the Cabinet."
Well, "need" to have them may not be the root of the problem. If
the CNN statement is the "real" Romney answer that is reassuring;
if the "wait until they get a higher percentage in the population"
is the answer that is deeply troubling. Of course, a rival camp
thinks the latter is the "real" Romney, offering this: "Today we
learn that this guy is not sure whether or not he'll appoint folks
based on the specific percentage of people of a certain background?
Does merit not matter? Or should any African American, Hispanic
American or Asian American appointments be worried they only can
get a job in a Romney administration based on their percentage of
the population? That sounds like a Hillary cabinet, affirmative
action based, not one determined by a businessman's acumen to find
the very best."
UPDATE: The divorce issue seems to have been only an
observation by Romney that voters are "concerned" about divorced
politicians. (But are they? Has that hurt McCain, Thompson or even
Rudy? This says
divorce rateslower as a concern than
how much voters like a candidate's spouse.)