The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Phil, you are right of course, that Romney doesn't want to get into an argument with Rudy about crime stats. The Tuttman story gave Rudy the opening to talk about his strong suit (and others to leap into the affirmative action debate) but Romney did not need to take the bait. Stories like this suggest maybe Judge Tuttman was not in the wrong (good for Romney that his judge wasn't a liberal wimp but bad since he instantly threw her under the bus) but also that crime was not a top priority for Romney. Every minute spent on this by Romney is not spent on immigration, or taxes or fending off Huckabee. That is perhaps the biggest downside for him of a story like this.

topics:
Taxes, Immigration

Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by Jennifer Rubin

http://spectator.org/blog/2007/11/27/re-romney-v-rudy-on-crime
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

Bigoted Barack, Red in Tooth and Clause

George Neumayr | 2.10.12

Unsafe at Any Smoke

Eric Peters | 2.10.12

Access This

Ross Kaminsky | 2.10.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

The Show Me State's No Show Primary

Andrew B. Wilson | 2.10.12

No Double Play

Peter Hannaford | 2.10.12

ADVERTISEMENT