Thompson gets into it with Chris
Wallace, seeming to blame Fox for his woes. Notably, he --as he
has done in the past -- seems to cast his hope in the Southern
state primaries which may be realistic but not inspire confidence
in a successful nationwide campaign.
Huckabee
fights back --using the "A" word(authenticity) and the "C"
word(consistency) to go after Romney.
But the real fireworks were
Rudy ( h/t The Page) going on the offensive against Romney,
sensing perhaps with the Tuttman controversy an opportunity to
scrutinize Romney's record. He is focusing on three issues: crime,
economics and healthcare. On crime, his campaign is happy to go toe
to toe with Romney on their respective records on fighting crime.
In particular, they may go after Romney, given the recent news, on
failure to ever enact
mandatory post-release supervision for prisoners, an issue
which Romney ran on in 2002 but never
accomplished during his term despite
efforts of Lt. Gov Kerry
Healy. On the economy the two continue exchanging barbs with
Rudy today invoking the CATO
report card and Romney saying Rudy never balanced the budget.(
Club for
Growth gives the best run down in their White Papers if anyone
is looking for some hard facts on who did what and how successfully
they did it.) Perhaps the most interesting duel is on healthcare.
Romney says he did something no other candidate did -- achieve
near universal healthcare without taxes. The danger here is
conservatives won't like the notion that a government mandate
complete with fines is a "no tax" plan-- it is in fact a government
imposed cost on individuals and businesses, they will argue.
(Michael Tanner from CATO has made the argument
that once you buy into "universal coverage" rather than "universal
access" you have ceded the argument to the liberals.) Rudy is
making the tongue in cheek argument that Romney has "learned his
lesson" and is now abandoning an individual mandate plan as he runs
for president.
This is turning in one heck of a fight and
Wednesday's debate may reveal just how personal and just how
aggressive the candidates are becoming.