The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

But, then, what's a few million between friends?

The most telling quote from the Post piece: "Some researchers…contend that persistent overestimates in the widely quoted U.N. reports have long skewed funding decisions and obscured potential lessons about how to slow the spread of HIV. Critics have also said that U.N. officials overstated the extent of the epidemic to help gather political and financial support for combating AIDS."

"There was a tendency toward alarmism, and that fit perhaps a certain fundraising agenda," said Helen Epstein, author of The Invisible Cure: Africa, the West, and the Fight Against AIDS. "I hope these new numbers will help refocus the response in a more pragmatic way."

Just how wrong was the UN? "The United Nations has cut its estimate of HIV cases in India by more than half because of a[n alternate, non-UN] study completed this year."

topics:
United Nations, Africa

About the Author

James David Dickson, a former Collegiate Network Fellow at The American Spectator, reports on human interest stories for AnnArbor.com.

http://spectator.org/blog/2007/11/20/un-aids-epidemic-overstated

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT