The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Thoughts on Hillarycare

Hillarycare was probably a major reason the Democrats experienced historic losses in 1994. The Contract with America was important, but not necessarily more so than the recoil from an attempt to socialize 12% of the national economy.

Back in 1992, Americans weren't nearly as antsy about their health care as they are today. HMO's produced inconveniences but lowered premiums substantially. People who were covered by their employer were generally okay with their out of pocket costs and with what they were getting. Certainly that was the case with white collar types.

Today, I think the picture is different. Premiums, even HMO premiums, have gone up considerably. The co-pays are higher, the base prices are higher, many drugs cost more, etc. Employers are feeling the squeeze, too. GM's Rick Waggoner has complained that he often feels he's in the health care business rather than the automobile business.

What I'm suggesting is that the idea of off-loading health care costs onto the government is becoming a more attractive idea. I suspect a company like Ford or GM would almost certainly benefit from a government takeover of health care. At the same time, health care plans have become expensive enough for people covered by their employers to make them more willing to listen to talk of government sponsored care for all.

Private health insurance was once an attractive way for employers to compensate employees without exposing them to more tax liability. That win-win, for reasons of medical liability and other factors that increase cost, has become a source of growing alarm for both employers and employees. The interests of corporate welfare and individual welfare are coming together in a perfect storm. Democrats, generally interested in extending the New Deal and the Great Society, are eager to oblige.

The standard case against government health care has been that it will result in much higher taxes, that health care delivery will become less customer friendly, that services will become more scarce, and that the pace of innovation will drop off sharply. That case is still a strong one, but I'm not certain at all Americans and, perhaps more important, American corporations are nearly as resistant as they once were. I suspect that if a Democrat is elected, national health care will be in the bag.

topics:
Taxes, Health Care, Business, Oil

Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by Hunter Baker

http://spectator.org/blog/2007/11/14/thoughts-on-hillarycare

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Gallup: Veterans Prefer Romney

W. James Antle, III | 5.28.12

Markos Moulitsas is Scum

Quin Hillyer | 5.28.12

Weekend Political Wrap-Up, Memorial Day Edition

W. James Antle, III | 5.27.12

An Honor Flight Story

TAS Staff | 5.26.12

WaPost Criticizes Romney's Lack of Rhythm

Aaron Goldstein | 5.25.12

Tom Coburn on the Debt 'Disease'

Vivien Chang | 5.25.12

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

In a Class of His Own

Daniel J. Flynn | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT