The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

As Jim noted below, Ron Paul ended up raising a staggering amount of money online yesterday, a sum that would would be impressive for any candidate, even Hillary Clinton. As of this writing, he is up to about $7.3 million for the quarter. He may outraise Thompson, Giuliani and/or Romney (less personal donations) this quarter. Give the man his due--he clearly has a base of enthusiastic followers.

With that said, I don't really see what impact he'll have on this race. There are a few basic ways that a candidate can affect the outcome of nomination battle: either by winning the nomination, pulling support from one of the other candidates, or by dropping out and endorsing somebody else. As enthusiastic as Paul supporters are, there's no evidence from scientific polls that he has any shot of capturing the nomination. Whether or not his supporters like it, or think it should be this way, the reality is that Paul's opposition to the Iraq War, indifference to an Iranian nuclear weapon, and his general philosophy on foreign policy, put him at odds with an overwhelming majority of Republicans on the dominant issues of the day. Sure, Paul can use his money to take out television ads and he may have a strong showing in New Hampsire among libertarians and anti-war independents, but he won't win, nor will he do as well in closed primaries. And unlike Huckabee (who can affect the race by pulling social conservative votes from Romney, Thompson, and possibly McCain), Paul is not likely to pull many votes from any top-tier Republicans, since none of them endorse his anti-war positions. Ron Paul supporters tend to be made up of disillusioned libertarians and independents, many of whom are completely turned off by the Republican Party, and would not be voting for any of the top Republicans anyway. I would even guess that a lot of his supporters would not be voting at all if Paul were not in the race. And it's not as if he's going to drop out of the race and endorse any Republican. So, the Paul candidacy is another interesting angle in the most dynamic Republican nomination battle in decades, but let's keep everything in perspective.

topics:
Foreign Policy, Hillary Clinton, Television, Iraq, Iran

Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by Philip Klein

http://spectator.org/blog/2007/11/06/pauls-haul-doesnt-change-the-b

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Gallup: Veterans Prefer Romney

W. James Antle, III | 5.28.12

Markos Moulitsas is Scum

Quin Hillyer | 5.28.12

Weekend Political Wrap-Up, Memorial Day Edition

W. James Antle, III | 5.27.12

An Honor Flight Story

TAS Staff | 5.26.12

WaPost Criticizes Romney's Lack of Rhythm

Aaron Goldstein | 5.25.12

Tom Coburn on the Debt 'Disease'

Vivien Chang | 5.25.12

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

In a Class of His Own

Daniel J. Flynn | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT