He certainly is the biggest fish there but friends of multiple Romney opponents this morning are quick to remind us that Gregg backed Bush who lost to McCain in a landslide in 2000. More importantly, Romney is doing multiple events in NH today, clearly not wanting to cede ground to Rudy and to Thompson who are both there. (Romney isn't taking Iowa for granted either and heads there for two days this week.) But the damning with faint praise award (while I step on your foot and stick my finger in your eye) goes to Rudy today for his radio interview in NH today where he "praises" Romney for dumping that individual health insurance mandate plan from Massachusetts. The key line: " They mandated health insurance in Massachusetts. Now in fairness to Mitt Romney, he now says that he would not do that. In other words, he wouldn't do what he did in Massachsuetts for the rest of the country, which shows it was a mistake to mandate health insurance." NH is turning out to be one heck of an interesting battleground.
UPDATE: Although Sen. Gregg is pro-life he is not totally in
line with Romney's current positions, especially on immigration
which has been the source of recent jousting with Thompson and
Rudy. He for example voted in favor of McCain's immigration
proposals and had this to say about opponents of comprehensive
immigration reform: " There are,
unfortunately, people who wish to bury their heads in the sand by
ignoring the threat our present dysfunctional system represents to
our country, and who are using a jingoistic and demagogic approach
of position to immigrants as a way to raise their own political
visibility. These politicians are not constructive players to the
process of working towards solving one of America's most pressing
and critical problems. Congressman Tancredo has chosen to align
himself with this approach. I strongly reject this new 'know
nothing' wing of the political spectrum and hope the people of New
Hampshire will as well."
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.