The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

After today Jim, I could not agree more. Sometimes we get obsessed with theories of why someone is winning and what issues matter. But if you see the candidates on display as they were at the RJC -whether in person or via the web - what struck you most was the performance gap in presentation between the candidates. Yes, it was a very pro-Rudy crowd but he made the most of it and his political skills are sometimes not fully appreciated. He is good in a big room and in debates and that matters. It's not everything but it counts. A very talented politician usually, but not always, beats less talented ones.

Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Jennifer Rubin

http://spectator.org/blog/2007/10/16/re-contemplating-the-meanin-1

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

A Test of National Honor

Hal G.P. Colebatch | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT